ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical effectiveness of modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy by using double-mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 61 patients with pelvic organ prolapse who received LSC from September 1,2012 to September 30,2017.Among 61 patients,32 cases received modified LSC(modified group)and 29 cases received traditional Y-mesh LSC(traditional group).The intraoperative and postoperative parameters were compared between the two groups and the improvement in subjective symptoms was evaluated by using the simple questionnaire(PFIQ-7)and subjective cure rate was assessed.RESULTS: The difference was of statistical significance in operation time[(127.34+7.88)min vs.(143.28+15.38)min]between the modified group and the traditional group(P0.05).The median follow-up time of 61 patients was 28 months.In the modified group and traditional group,the objective cure rates were 96.86% and 89.65%,respectively.After operation each indicator point was recovered anatomically according to POP-Q,and there was statistical difference compared with before operation.The score of postoperative PFIQ-7 was obviously reduced compared to the preoperative parameter.The subjective cure rates of the modified group and traditional group were 100% and 94.74%,respectively.There was no new complications occurring in the modified group.There were 3 cases of postoperative mesh exposure in the traditional group.The symptoms of urinary incontinence disappeared after TVT-O in both groups.Two new cases of urinary incontinence occured in both groups after surgery.CONCLUSION: Both of the two operations for pelvic organ prolapse are safe and effective.The modified LSC is an alternative surgical option for ptatients with pelvic organ prolapse because of its advantages,such as simpler operation,shorter operation time,and fewer longterm complications.